Одговори на темата

Порака

<blockquote data-quote="Abraxas" data-source="post: 355940" data-attributes="member: 2368">0=2A common shorthand for the ontology of Thelema is known as &quot;0=2.&quot; This equation is a shorthand for the proclamation of Nuit in the first chapter of Liber AL vel Legis:<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">&quot;None... and two. For I am divided for love's sake, for the chance of union. This is the creation of the world, that the pain of division is as nothing, and the joy of dissolution all.&quot; <a href="https://en.m.wikiversity.org/wiki/Metaphysics_-_The_Thelemic_Universe#cite_note-4">[4]</a></li>
</ul>&quot;None,&quot; or &quot;Naught,&quot; or simply &quot;0,&quot; refers to the un-differentiated non-dual substance, cognate with the Hindu 'Brahman' and/or 'Shiva,' the Chinese 'Tao,' the Buddhist 'Adi-Buddha,' the Gnostic 'pleroma,' etc. This &quot;None&quot; is another name for &quot;Unity,&quot; and is used to imply the continuity of this substance. This notion comes from Liber AL when it is written,<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">&quot;O Nuit, continuous one of Heaven, let it be ever thus; that men speak not of Thee as One but as None; and let them speak not of thee at all, since thou art continuous!&quot; <a href="https://en.m.wikiversity.org/wiki/Metaphysics_-_The_Thelemic_Universe#cite_note-5">[5]</a></li>
</ul>Crowley writes on this concept of &quot;0&quot; in his essay &quot;Berashith,&quot;<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">&quot;When we say that the cosmos sprang from the 0, what kind of 0 do we mean? By 0 in the ordinary sense of the term we mean 'absence of extension in any of the categories...' Nothingness is that about which no positive proposition is valid. We cannot truly affirm: 'Nothingness is green, or heavy, or sweet...; Let us call time, space, being, heaviness, hunger, the categories... This is the Advaitist idea of the future of man; his personality, bereft of all its qualities, disappears and is lost, while in its place arises the impersonal Unity, The Pleroma, Parabrahma, or the Allah of the Unity-adoring followers of Mohammed. (To the Muslim fakir, Allah is by no means a personal God.) Unity is thus unaffected, whether or no it be extended in any of the categories.&quot; <a href="https://en.m.wikiversity.org/wiki/Metaphysics_-_The_Thelemic_Universe#cite_note-6">[6]</a></li>
</ul>&quot;Two&quot; refers to the world we all are much more familiar with: the world of many dualities including light &amp; dark, pain &amp; pleasure, hot &amp; cold, good &amp; bad, etc. In Book of Lies, Crowley writes,<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">&quot;This Abyss is also called &quot;Hell&quot;, and &quot;The Many&quot;. / Its name is &quot;Consciousness&quot;, and &quot;The Universe&quot;, among men. / But THAT which neither is silent, nor speaks, rejoices therein.&quot;</li>
</ul><a href="https://en.m.wikiversity.org/wiki/Metaphysics_-_The_Thelemic_Universe">Link</a></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Abraxas, post: 355940, member: 2368"] [SIZE=3][B]0=2[/B][/SIZE] A common shorthand for the ontology of Thelema is known as "0=2." This equation is a shorthand for the proclamation of Nuit in the first chapter of Liber AL vel Legis: [LIST] [*][I]"None... and two. For I am divided for love's sake, for the chance of union. This is the creation of the world, that the pain of division is as nothing, and the joy of dissolution all." [URL='https://en.m.wikiversity.org/wiki/Metaphysics_-_The_Thelemic_Universe#cite_note-4'][4][/URL][/I] [/LIST] "None," or "Naught," or simply "0," refers to the un-differentiated non-dual substance, cognate with the Hindu 'Brahman' and/or 'Shiva,' the Chinese 'Tao,' the Buddhist 'Adi-Buddha,' the Gnostic 'pleroma,' etc. This "None" is another name for "Unity," and is used to imply the continuity of this substance. This notion comes from Liber AL when it is written, [LIST] [*][I]"O Nuit, continuous one of Heaven, let it be ever thus; that men speak not of Thee as One but as None; and let them speak not of thee at all, since thou art continuous!" [URL='https://en.m.wikiversity.org/wiki/Metaphysics_-_The_Thelemic_Universe#cite_note-5'][5][/URL][/I] [/LIST] Crowley writes on this concept of "0" in his essay "Berashith," [LIST] [*][I]"When we say that the cosmos sprang from the 0, what kind of 0 do we mean? By 0 in the ordinary sense of the term we mean 'absence of extension in any of the categories...' Nothingness is that about which no positive proposition is valid. We cannot truly affirm: 'Nothingness is green, or heavy, or sweet...; Let us call time, space, being, heaviness, hunger, the categories... This is the Advaitist idea of the future of man; his personality, bereft of all its qualities, disappears and is lost, while in its place arises the impersonal Unity, The Pleroma, Parabrahma, or the Allah of the Unity-adoring followers of Mohammed. (To the Muslim fakir, Allah is by no means a personal God.) Unity is thus unaffected, whether or no it be extended in any of the categories."[/I] [URL='https://en.m.wikiversity.org/wiki/Metaphysics_-_The_Thelemic_Universe#cite_note-6'][6][/URL] [/LIST] "Two" refers to the world we all are much more familiar with: the world of many dualities including light & dark, pain & pleasure, hot & cold, good & bad, etc. In [I]Book of Lies[/I], Crowley writes, [LIST] [*][I]"This Abyss is also called "Hell", and "The Many". / Its name is "Consciousness", and "The Universe", among men. / But THAT which neither is silent, nor speaks, rejoices therein."[/I] [/LIST] [URL='https://en.m.wikiversity.org/wiki/Metaphysics_-_The_Thelemic_Universe']Link[/URL] [/QUOTE]

Верификација

Каква боја е тревата?

Барај

Барај

Одговори на темата